Re: Call Trace

[Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/09/2007 10:49 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> On 09/08/07, Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 08/09/2007 09:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > > On 09/08/07, Stavros Passas <stabat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > For example, one line could be :
> > > >  [<ffffffff802478c1>] acct_collect+0x42/0x18e
> > > [<address_of_function>] name_of_function+offset_into_function/size_of_function
> > "return address as found on stack", rather than "address_of_function".
> Right, as found on stack, I guess I should have elaborated on that bit - thanks.

Well... hope I'm not annoying you or anything, but the "return address" bit 
was actually more the point than the "as found on stack" bit. If the printed 
name is "name_of_function" then the printed address is not 
address_of_function (but address_of_function+offset_into_function).

Rene.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ