[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shared Interrupt handling.

To: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Shared Interrupt handling.
From: "k b" <k_bisla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 18:23:46 -0700
Bcc:
In-reply-to: <20070502224356.GA22143@gateway.home>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <kernelnewbies.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,
Can someone explain how the kernel figures out which interrupt handler
to call when the interrupt line is shared.

Any insight would be helpful.

thanks
KB

_________________________________________________________________ Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN In Concert today. http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared Interrupt handling.
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: Shared Interrupt handling.
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- Re: is anyone seriously using execute-in-place (in embedded systems)?
  - From: Erik Mouw

Prev by Date: Re: is anyone seriously using execute-in-place (in embedded systems)?
Next by Date: Re: Shared Interrupt handling.
Previous by thread: Re: is anyone seriously using execute-in-place (in embedded systems)?
Next by thread: Re: Shared Interrupt handling.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread