[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?

To: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
From: Daniel Cheng <gmane@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:21:16 +0800
Cc: linux-newbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7783925d0704040605s4590d421y39ae5b13a020a8a@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <kernelnewbies.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7783925d0704040521q3755394uf774884b5298eec2@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.0.83.0704040858070.28216@sigma.j-a-k-j.com> <7783925d0704040605s4590d421y39ae5b13a020a8a@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329)

Rick Brown wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware that there are quite a lot of different patches /
> projects aimed at giving better RTOS behaviour ... but my question was
> aimed at vanilla kernel.

An OS consider RealTime or not, does not depends on
how low the latency is. It depends on how predictable
the latency is.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rick


-- 
This space was intended to be left blank.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
  - From: Tzahi Fadida

References:
- Why is Linux not RTOS?
  - From: Rick Brown
- Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
  - From: John Anthony Kazos Jr.
- Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
  - From: Rick Brown

Prev by Date: Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
Next by Date: cannot create sda16
Previous by thread: Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
Next by thread: Re: Why is Linux not RTOS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread