Re: About result of rt/hrt patch, is it reasonable?

["Lee David" <live4thee@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/3/06, Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well the reason you don't really see much difference between the hrt and the rt
> is because your not really stressing your machine at the same time you run this.
> All you are really seeing is the high-res timer capabilities added to your
> kernel. As you probably know the rt patch does contain the hrt patch set. For a
> "maybe" better or more stressing test of your system you might see
>
> ftp://ftp.compro.net/public/rt-exec

Hi, Mark

Do you mean that when under trivial load, rt/hrt will almost behavior the same,
while rt will get significantly better result under high load because of its
latency optimazations?

Yes I know that hrt already merged into rt patch set, and I did have rt-exec
on my machine, too. I will do some furthur study and thanks for your pointing
out.

Thanks,
D.L.

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/