Hi Daniel Bonekeeper,
i'm ready to donate considerable amount of my time(for writing device driver) if anybody is ready to co-ordinate on the activity.
i'm a newbie and want to get my hands dirty with some real stuff.. let me know if you are interested in the deal.
-Vamsi.
-----Original Message-----
From: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Alon Bar-Lev
Sent: Mon 7/3/2006 3:34 PM
To: Daniel Bonekeeper
Cc: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Driver for Microsoft USB Fingerprint Reader
On 7/3/06, Daniel Bonekeeper <thehazard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I would like to develop a driver for any kind of fingerprint reader
> that currently doesn't have a driver for linux, and I'm open for
> suggestions on which device I should use. My first thought was the
> microsoft usb fingerprint reader
> (http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=DG2-00002-DT&cpc=SCH) because
> it's a new device (and, of course, doesn't have any driver for linux),
> it's cheap, and it's from MS (read "would be fun" =)
Please consider UPEK reader.
It is available on all new Thinkpad laptops, and the vendor provides
only binary drivers.
http://www.upek.com/support/dl_linux_bsp.asp
I hate when vendors like ATI, Conexant and UPEK publish binary drivers
without publishing the chipset spec... They should decide whether
their IP is on the software part or on the hardware part, if it is on
the hardware part, they are making money in selling the hardware. If
it is on the software part, there is no reason why not providing the
information for others to write software to work with the primitive
hardware. So in either case there should be full hardware interface
disclosure.
Best Regards and Goodluck!
Alon Bar-Lev.
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/