[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel

To: "Meswani, Mitesh" <mmeswani@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 06:57:06 +0200
Cc: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C26C730943E01145B4F89E37FE0A022002BBC7A2@itdsrvmail02.utep.edu>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-id: <kernelnewbies.nl.linux.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ecartis-owner@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C26C730943E01145B4F89E37FE0A022002BBC7A2@itdsrvmail02.utep.edu>
Reply-to: arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> 
> Any help and ideas are highly appreciated. 
> Please also let me know if there is an alternate approach for
> executing user code in kernel space with a way of invoking it. 
>  

you just found out one of the reasons why system call replacing is evil:
It's architecture dependent. On powerpc you need to do more than you did
(like fix the other system call table as well).....


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/

References:
- Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel
  - From: Meswani, Mitesh

Prev by Date: Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel
Next by Date: Returned mail: Data format error
Previous by thread: Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel
Next by thread: Re: Intercept System call using Kernel module is 2.6 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread