On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 23:42:00 +0800, raven@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > Hello, Jan. > > > > (NOTE: I listed some functions where I want to use 'current', > > and the following is Jan's answer. > > Not applicable to all functions defined in fs/*.c !) > > "Jan Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>" wrote: > > > Summary: All of the functions can safely use current without any special > > > precautions whatsoever. All of them may (and usualy do) sleep, since > > > they need [to wait for disk] > > Not sure that's always the case. > > I believe that threads that share current->fs? The threads *that* share current->fs WHAT? Yes, two processes (with common ancestor) MAY share current->fs. That implies WHAT? > What am I missing? The fact, that we are NOT talking about current->fs! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature