Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: synchronization without hardware support, pankaj chauhan
  • Re: synchronization without hardware support, Nir Tzachar
    • Re: synchronization without hardware support, Arjan van de Ven
      • Re: synchronization without hardware support, Nir Tzachar
      • Re: synchronization without hardware support, Ameet Gandhare
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: synchronization without hardware support, Momchil Velikov
    • Re: synchronization without hardware support, John Navil Joseph
• sock_map_fd(), jnf
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: sock_map_fd(), jnf
• What was your first kernel hack?, Tim Cambrant
  • Re: What was your first kernel hack?, Daniel Drake
  • Re: What was your first kernel hack?, Rik van Riel
  • Re: What was your first kernel hack?, Muthukumar Ratty
• building makefiles/modules in 2.6.0, threadhead
  • Re: building makefiles/modules in 2.6.0, Jaime Medrano
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Re: building makefiles/modules in 2.6.0, threadhead
• How to calculate the memory used by several processes?, Martinez, Michael
• Questions regarding struct sock, 15160
• WINNING NOTIFICATION, ROBERT DUNCAN
• Re:Sharpen your mind, Ada Sorensen
• Skeptical?, Junior Butler
• skbuff query, Kiran Kumar
  • Re: skbuff query, Muthukumar Ratty
• Dereferenced null pointer, Frank.A.Uepping
  • Re: Dereferenced null pointer, coywolf
  • Re: Dereferenced null pointer, David Gillies
• pos != &file->f_pos, Frank.A.Uepping
  • Re: pos != &file->f_pos, Bernd Petrovitsch
  • Re: pos != &file->f_pos, Jaime Medrano
• pthread creates one extra thread, Shesha Sreenivasamurthy
  • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Jan Krause
  • Message not available
    • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Rob Love
      • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Jan Krause
      • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Muthukumar Ratty
      • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Rob Love
  • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Shine Mohamed
  • RE: pthread creates one extra thread, Praveen Nair
  • Re: pthread creates one extra thread, Jan Hudec
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: pthread creates one extra thread, Florin Malita
• No Subject, kernelnewbies-bounce
• module function design question., jnf
  • Re: module function design question., Anjaneyulu
    • Re: module function design question., jnf
      • Re: module function design question., Anjaneyulu
  • Re: module function design question., Jan Hudec
    • Re: module function design question., jnf
      • Re: module function design question., Jan Hudec
• hal / dbus / udev problem, Kiran Kumar
  • Re: hal / dbus / udev problem, Greg KH
    • Re: hal / dbus / udev problem, Kiran Kumar
      • Re: hal / dbus / udev problem, Greg KH
  • Re: hal / dbus / udev problem, Rob Love
    • Re: hal / dbus / udev problem, Kiran Kumar
• documentation about net layer in the kernel, john paul
  • Re: documentation about net layer in the kernel, Jan Hudec
• dropping packets with dev_add_pack()'ed function, threadhead
• UNMAP a raw device, Shesha Sreenivasamurthy
• SEEK_END on raw devices, Shesha Sreenivasamurthy
• God bless You, samuel bello
• compiling linux-2.5.50, Piyush Bansal
  • Re: compiling linux-2.5.50, Muthukumar Ratty
    • Re: compiling linux-2.5.50, Eugene Teo
• Gotos, Tim Cambrant
  • Re: Gotos, Momchil Velikov
  • Message not available
    • Re: Gotos, Tim Cambrant
  • Re: Gotos, Muli Ben-Yehuda
    • Re: Gotos, Ed L Cashin
  • Re: Gotos, David Gillies
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Re: Gotos, Phil White
    • Re: Gotos, Momchil Velikov
      • Re: Gotos, Momchil Velikov
• [Fwd: Re: Gotos], K.R. Foley
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Gotos], Momchil Velikov
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [Fwd: Re: Gotos], K.R. Foley
• Which cases appropriate for adjusting /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl, Martinez, Michael
• Additions to goto discussion, Anticipating a Reply
  • Re: Additions to goto discussion, Jan Hudec
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Additions to goto discussion, Anticipating a Reply
• Module compilation failed for kernel 2.6.0, Frank.A.Uepping