[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.0 module differences

To: Paul Gearon <pag@pisoftware.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0 module differences
From: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 13:48:55 +0000
Cc: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FA9CA04.9050903@pisoftware.com>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;kernelnewbies-archive@nl.linux.org
References: <3FA9CA04.9050903@pisoftware.com>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:11:48PM +1000, Paul Gearon wrote:

>   insmod: error inserting 'modulename.o': -1 Invalid module format

Read the FAQ. Note that with recent 2.6, they broke external module
building again, unfortunately. I hope this'll get fixed soon.

regards
john

-- 
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/

References:
- 2.6.0 module differences
  - From: Paul Gearon <pag@pisoftware.com>

Prev by Date: Re: booting linux on different partitions
Next by Date: any particular reason why c and not c++
Prev by thread: 2.6.0 module differences
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.0 module differences
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread