[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
macro
To
: <
kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
>
Subject
: macro
From
: "R!SC" <
risc54@inwind.it
>
Date
: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:43:25 +0200
List-archive
: <
http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
>
List-help
: <
mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:riel@nl.linux.org
>
List-post
: <
mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
>
List-software
: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe
>
Original-Recipient
: rfc822;kernelnewbies-archive@nl.linux.org
Sender
:
kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
often i see in the linux kernel source, the macro written in following mode:
#define macro_name do{
asm volatile{....}
while(0);
why use do while(0) if the number of loop is one?
Thanks
R!SC
Prev by Date:
Re: vga programming question
Next by Date:
Re: macro
Prev by thread:
Redhat Linux 7.3 gui problem
Next by thread:
Re: macro
Index(es):
Date
Thread