[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Generic System call handler

To: Swapnil Nagle <swaps@protonic.com>
Subject: Re: Generic System call handler
From: Sridhar N <srin@symonds.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:26:00 +0530
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
In-Reply-To: <21412546848889@MAIL.leftcoast.net>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:kernelnewbies-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;kernelnewbies-archive@nl.linux.org
References: <21412546848889@MAIL.leftcoast.net>
Sender: kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org

On Saturday 30 March 2002 16:11, Swapnil Nagle wrote:
> Have a look at Syscall tracker :
> http://syscalltrack.sourceforge.net/
Not what i want.  It ( so does SNARE)supports *specific* syscalls, but not 
the generic one i want to build. 

regards
Sridhar

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Generic System call handler
  - From: Frank Schaefer <frank.schafer@setuza.cz>

Prev by Date: htable
Next by Date: linux 0.0.1
Prev by thread: htable
Next by thread: Re: Generic System call handler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread