Re: signal.h conflicting with linux/signal.h (2.4.0)

[Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@ragingbull.com>]

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Joseph A. Knapka wrote:

> There are probably exceptions to the rule above, for code that
> does very Linux-centric, non-portable tasks that are not supported
> by glibc.

Yes, I believe, this was the case - I used a 'non-standard' patch to the
kernel, so I needed to include those headers. What do I do in this case?

Thanks
Guennadi
___

Dr. Guennadi V. Liakhovetski
Department of Applied Mathematics
University of Sheffield, U.K.
email: G.Liakhovetski@sheffield.ac.uk


-
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/
IRC Channel:   irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
Web Page:      http://www.kernelnewbies.org/