[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]

To: John Levon <moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]
From: Mark McLoughlin <mark@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 12:00:12 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "'kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org'" <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103091143170.12439-100000@mrbusy.compsoc.man.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org

On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, John Levon wrote:

> I believe if you *ever* have to include modversions.h explicitly something
> has gone badly wrong ...

Not, if the module is to be built away from the kernel tree. If you want
to integrate it into the tree then you don't have to worry about any
of this crap....

> Just turn the damn thing off :)

true, true ;)

Mark

-
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/
IRC Channel:   irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
Web Page:      http://www.surriel.com/kernelnewbies.shtml

References:
- Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]
  - From: John Levon <moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]
Next by Date: Re: character device driver for I/O-card.
Prev by thread: Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]
Next by thread: Re: Symbol Versioning [Was Re: Unresolved Symbol in Module]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread