[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[fc] Re: Proposal



How could we 'attack' cleanly? I dont think we should be reduced to a slagging match. Holding M$ weaknesses as a comprehensive list in one place ie this site would be good i believe.

Steven Jones aka Thing

>>> Marek Habersack <grendel@vip.net.pl> 10/08/99 11:44 >>>
* D Clyde Williamson said:

> > It's no FUD, but it's no fud debunking either. I was planning to
> > use this as a place to inform users of issues and take out the
> > uncertainty that was introduced by marketeers.
> 
> Good point. 
> 
> I was thinking of this as being more on the offensive side. Instead of
> just defending our products/ideas I think it would be good to force
> Microsoft to move from an Offensive position to a defensive one.... If
> we don't want to do that ... it quite alright:)
It's too early to charge. We have no confirmed facts gathered together.
Unbeatable facts is what we need. Testimonies, case studies etc.
 
marek

-
Fud-counter:  Setting straight the facts
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site:     http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/