Re: [fc] RE: Proposal

["Steven Jones" <StevenJ@ghw.co.nz>]

Yes a good link page to the security pages of each distro would be a plus. i agree we have to stick to cold hard fact ( or at least present all the data so people can decide) otherwise we risk being tarred with the same brush as M$ and I bet we would suffer this worse than M$ will.



>>> Marek Habersack <grendel@vip.net.pl> 10/08/99 10:47 >>>
* Tom Pfau said:

> Regarding FUD:
> 
> If they post FUD, we should post FACT and pointers to evidence.  When the
> linux community labels something as FUD, it's seen as a knee-jerk reaction
> or an emotional response.  Let's skip that and go straight to the facts.  If
> you would like to reference the original FUD, do it in the same way
> Microsoft did: Myth vs. Reality.  Don't call it FUD.
I agree. Only straight and proven facts should be used by us and no
accusations of any kind.
 
> I also would like to see an area on the site for things like the security
> article passed around earlier.  Very informative.
Security is an important matter here, so I fully second that.

marek

-
Fud-counter:  Setting straight the facts
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site:     http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/