[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [fc] New to list



Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Zak McGregor wrote:
> > I have a proposal for a name - with reverse-recursion, if you like:
> >
> > DUF: Deconstructing Unfounded FUD
> 
> Sounds great to me. Does anyone have objections to this?

I still object to using 'FUD'.  We should present the truth about linux
and act as a site people can be referred to when presented with FUD.  We
should not be responsing directly to FUD.

When Microsoft or someone else posts misleading or erroneous information
about linux, I want the responses to include pointers to this site for
the evidence that backs them up.  The term 'FUD' is loaded.  Don't use
it as the focus for the site.

-- 
Thomas Pfau
pfau@maherterminals.com
aka pfau@eclipse.net
http://www.eclipse.net/~pfau/
-
Fud-counter:  Setting straight the facts
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site:     http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/