[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fc] New to list
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Zak McGregor wrote:
> > I have a proposal for a name - with reverse-recursion, if you like:
> >
> > DUF: Deconstructing Unfounded FUD
>
> Sounds great to me. Does anyone have objections to this?
I still object to using 'FUD'. We should present the truth about linux
and act as a site people can be referred to when presented with FUD. We
should not be responsing directly to FUD.
When Microsoft or someone else posts misleading or erroneous information
about linux, I want the responses to include pointers to this site for
the evidence that backs them up. The term 'FUD' is loaded. Don't use
it as the focus for the site.
--
Thomas Pfau
pfau@maherterminals.com
aka pfau@eclipse.net
http://www.eclipse.net/~pfau/
-
Fud-counter: Setting straight the facts
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site: http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/