[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WebPage / Re: [fc] WANTED: volunteers
Thomas Strohm wrote:
> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
Please run whatever we come up with through the HTML validator at
http://validator.w3.org/.
> <center><h1><font color=blue>
> fud-counter web page
> </font></h1></center>
>...
> This web page is dedicated to the defense of FUD attacks to Linux. It
I really don't like posting the word FUD. Are we truly defending
against FUD or are we promoting linux? I think we should concentrate
more on presenting the truth than on making it look like we're just
countering the FUD.
> <h2>
> 1. Facts
> </h2>
>
> (This section is for arguments pro and con Linux. The properties
> argued upon should be grouped somehow. I like the scheme of <a
> href="http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/fud-counter/1999-10/msg00013.html">Thomas
> Pfau</a>)
That was just my response to Microsoft's page but I don't think that's
how we should present the site. We should not be countering the FUD
point for point. If the referenced article were rewritten as a
description of linux and it's capabilities instead of as a response to
Microsoft's page, it might be a good start.
> <h3>
> FUD and answer
> </h3>
I suppose we need a section to do this but the main focus of the page
should be the truth about linux. Sort of like DEC's old software
product descriptions (SPD). Anyone familiar with these? They pretty
much declared what each software product was capable of and defined the
extent of what each could do.
> <h3>
> Comparison charts
> </h3>
THIS would be great to have on the site. Compare operating systems
feature for feature.
--
Thomas Pfau
pfau@maherterminals.com
aka pfau@eclipse.net
http://www.eclipse.net/~pfau/
-
Fud-counter: Setting straight the facts
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site: http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/