Re: Proposal

[Ramon van Handel <vhandel@chem.vu.nl>]

Tom Pfau wrote:
> >IIa.   The Best Defense Is A Good Offense
> >
> >       Responding line-by-line to FUD, such as the recent MS drivel, allows
> >Our opponents to manipulate us. We cannot permit this. One postitve
> >thing to do would be create the NO-FUD FAQ, this document would cover
> >the many standard FUD points (Swap Partitions, Memory, Journaling
> >Filesystem, etc., etc., etc.)
> 
> I propose that we not use the acronym FUD anywhere on the web site.  We
> should just post the truth with pointers to the evidence whenever we see
> FUD.

This is a rather stupid question but what DOES FUD actually
stand for ?  I know what it is but I never have figured out
the acronym :)

> Here! Here!  I'd like to take another look at Microsoft's TCO study for
> Solaris and see if their methods could be applied to linux.  Anyone care to
> help?

Where can I find the TCO study ?  I've never read it.
 
Ramon

-
Fud-counter:  Setting straight the facts
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web Site:     http://fud-counter.nl.linux.org/