[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
humbolt robustness tested
Hi,
<insert ashamed emoticon here> While playing a bit with
humbolt (remote, mind you!) I su()d to root and was testing
a few performance things.
Then I accidentally switched on 'I/O support' with hdparm and
<BANG> the machine crashes at friday evening...
Luckily I had the softdog driver compiled in so the machine
was back online with all functions working properly in about
4 minutes.
For all other system functions a similar watchdog function
is built in (all daemons are started from a special monitor
instead of from /etc/rc.d/*) so the rest of the system should
be just as safe...
Guess I have now (accidentally) proven that Humbolt's
config is crashproof. And even better -- I got away
with it :) [phew, I am really relieved that it worked]
happy 1999,
Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. riel@humbolt.geo.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/~riel |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+